UPDATED: 09-19-26 13:31 PDT

hoop Mass.
  
Mass.                 
W-L: ( 3- 0) PR = 91.5381

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 903 A Rutgers ( 0- 3, 79.6) 37- 21 912 H Sacred Heart 37- 10 919 H Stonehill 36- 14 926 A Sacramento State 1003 H Ea. Michigan ( 1- 3, 74.0) 1010 H Miami (OH) ( 1- 2, 82.8) 1017 A Buffalo ( 1- 2, 75.1) 1023 A UConn ( 2- 1, 82.8) 1104 H Ball State ( 1- 2, 75.4) 1111 A Toledo ( 2- 1, 81.0) 1118 H Akron ( 1- 2, 72.8) 1128 A Bowl'g Green ( 0- 3, 76.6)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   903 A Rutgers                37-21      16    11    ++     4.09

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   903 A Rutgers                37-21      16    11    ++     4.09

Mass. Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Boston Col Mass. tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Mass.
California Mass.   Mass.
Clemson Mass.   Mass.
Duke Duke   Duke
Florida St Mass.   Mass.
Georgia Tech Mass.   Mass.
Louisville Mass.   Mass.
Miami Miami   Miami
No. Carolina Mass.   Mass.
NC State Mass.   Mass.
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh   Pittsburgh
SMU Mass.   Mass.
Stanford Mass.   Mass.
Syracuse Mass.   Mass.
Virginia Mass.   Mass.
Va. Tech Va. Tech   Va. Tech
Wake Forest Mass.   Mass.
Army Mass.   Mass.
Charlotte Mass.   Mass.
Ea. Carolina Mass.   Mass.
Fl. Atlantic Mass.   Mass.
Memphis Mass.   Mass.
Navy Mass.   Mass.
No. Texas Mass.   Mass.
Rice Mass.   Mass.
So. Florida So. Florida   So. Florida
Temple Mass.   Mass.
Tulane Mass.   Mass.
Tulsa Tulsa   Tulsa
UAB Mass.   Mass.
UTSA Mass.   Mass.
Arizona Mass.   Mass.
Arizona St Mass.   Mass.
BYU BYU   BYU
Baylor Mass.   Mass.
Cincinnati Mass.   Mass.
Colorado Mass.   Mass.
Houston Mass.   Mass.
Iowa State Mass.   Mass.
Kansas Mass.   Mass.
Kansas St Kansas St   Kansas St
Oklahoma St Mass.   Mass.
TCU Mass.   Mass.
Texas Tech Mass.   Mass.
UCF UCF   UCF
Utah Utah   Utah
We. Virginia We. Virginia   We. Virginia
Illinois Mass.   Mass.
Indiana Indiana   Indiana
Iowa Iowa   Iowa
Maryland Mass.   Mass.
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Michigan St Mass.   Mass.
Minnesota Mass.   Mass.
Nebraska Nebraska   Nebraska
Northwestern Northwestern   Northwestern
Ohio State Ohio State   Ohio State
Oregon Mass.   Mass.
Penn State Penn State   Penn State
Purdue Mass.   Mass.
Rutgers Mass. Mass.  
UCLA UCLA   UCLA
USC USC tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) USC
Washington Mass.   Mass.
Wisconsin Mass.   Mass.
Florida Int Mass.   Mass.
J'ville St Mass.   Mass.
Kennesaw St Mass.   Mass.
Liberty Mass.   Mass.
La. Tech Mass.   Mass.
Mid. Tenn. Mass.   Mass.
N. Mexico St Mass.   Mass.
Sam Houston Mass.   Mass.
UTEP Mass.   Mass.
We. Kentucky Mass.   Mass.
Notre Dame Notre Dame   Notre Dame
UConn Mass.   Mass.
Akron Mass.   Mass.
Ball State Mass.   Mass.
Bowl'g Green Mass.   Mass.
Buffalo Mass.   Mass.
Ce. Michigan Mass.   Mass.
Ea. Michigan Mass.   Mass.
Kent St Mass.   Mass.
Miami (OH) Mass.   Mass.
No. Illinois Mass.   Mass.
Ohio Mass.   Mass.
Toledo Mass.   Mass.
We. Michigan Mass.   Mass.
Air Force Mass.   Mass.
Boise St Mass.   Mass.
Colorado St Mass.   Mass.
Fresno St Mass.   Mass.
Hawai'i Mass.   Mass.
Nevada Mass.   Mass.
New Mexico Mass.   Mass.
San Diego St Mass.   Mass.
San Jose St Mass.   Mass.
UNLV Mass.   Mass.
Utah St Mass.   Mass.
Wyoming Mass.   Mass.
Oregon St Mass.   Mass.
Wash. St Mass.   Mass.
Alabama Alabama   Alabama
Arkansas Mass.   Mass.
Auburn Mass.   Mass.
Florida Florida   Florida
Georgia Georgia   Georgia
Kentucky Mass.   Mass.
LSU LSU   LSU
Missouri Missouri   Missouri
Miss. St Miss. St   Miss. St
Oklahoma Mass.   Mass.
Ole Miss Ole Miss   Ole Miss
So. Carolina Mass.   Mass.
Tennessee Tennessee   Tennessee
Texas Texas   Texas
Texas A&M Mass.   Mass.
Vanderbilt Mass.   Mass.
App State Mass.   Mass.
Arkansas St Mass.   Mass.
Coastal Car. Mass.   Mass.
Georgia So. Mass.   Mass.
Georgia St Mass.   Mass.
J. Madison Mass.   Mass.
Louisiana Mass.   Mass.
Marshall Mass.   Mass.
Old Dominion Mass.   Mass.
So. Miss Mass.   Mass.
So. Alabama Mass.   Mass.
Texas St. Mass.   Mass.
Troy Mass.   Mass.
UL Monroe Mass.   Mass.
Delaware Mass.   Mass.
Missouri St Mass.   Mass.

PowerWise = 105


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.93

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   1 A Rutgers         ( 0- 3, 79.6)    37-21      -20.28       8.46       1.00         2.93            55.36
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        55.36

winning pts = 55.3571 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------